Probably not as amusing or interesting to anyone else but after having just spent the day reading dull and predictable Guardian
articles about feminism (for research purposes!) the stupidity eventually got so stupid it turned funny and i just had to share it with someone...
A reader's letter from 2006 sent in response to an article about the state of feminism
Natasha Walter's excellent article raises many pertinent issues, but ignores the destructive part that trendy male post-structuralists have played in analysing the experiences of women. Poststructuralists deny even that "women" are a common category, sharing certain social and economic conditions. We need to remind ourselves - as bell hooks once famously pronounced - the master's tools will never dismantle the master's table.
University of Portsmouth
number 1. "trendy male post-structuralists"? because there are no women into post-structuralism are there, june?? because there are no *gasp in horror* feminists
into poststructuralism?? or a whole fucking field of study?? no of course its just those evil males trying to deconstruct the sisterhood into oblivion!
number 2. "the master's tools will never dismantle the master's table"??? oh my.
not only has she got the quote wrong but more disturbing, it was audre lorde who said it not bell hooks. but, you know, they are both black feminists, so i guess that's where the confusion lies! Possibly the worst mis-use, mis-quote and appropriation of Lorde/hooks I have yet to come across (which is quite a phenomenon by the way
June Purvis, you may note, is affiliated with the university of Portsmouth. She is in fact Professor of Women's and Gender History
there. She gets paid to, you know, know stuff about feminism and teach it to students. Which is really not so funny when it comes down to it...